Validity and Reliability of the Assessment Tool for Asthma (ATA) Questionnaire: the ATA Study

dc.authorid272290en_US
dc.authorid45660en_US
dc.authorid183219en_US
dc.contributor.authorBaygül, Arzu
dc.contributor.authorGemicioğlu, Bilun
dc.contributor.authorMungan, Dilşad
dc.contributor.author., ve diğer.
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-14T12:46:11Z
dc.date.available2020-10-14T12:46:11Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİstanbul Beykent Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: A multicenter trial was designed to validate the "Assessment Tools for Asthma (ATA)" questionnaire, a newly developed questionnaire, which evaluates both asthma control and risk factors associated with asthma control with a single instrument. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 810 cases from 14 clinics in 9 Turkish cities. The ATA questionnaire and Asthma Control Test (ACT) were administered. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the control status of 100 randomized cases. ATA is an eight-item physician-administered questionnaire. It comprises the following two sections-ATA1, assesses symptomatic control criteria, and the remaining section, queries the flare-up of asthma, control of comorbidities, treatment adherence, and inhaler technique. RESULTS: The mean scores for ATA1, ATA total, VAS, and ACT were 24.7 +/- 14.8, 53.8 +/- 19, 7.1 +/- 3, and 18.8 +/- 5.5, respectively. According to the ATA questionnaire, among all patients, 34.3% had controlled, 18.8% had partly controlled, and 46.9% had uncontrolled asthma. Furthermore, 16.6% patients had flare-ups between visits, 96.4% patients had uncontrolled comorbidity, 17% patients had irregular asthma treatment, and only 8.4% patients used the incorrect inhaler technique. The ATA questionnaire showed internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient=0.683). ACT, ATA1, and two specialists' evaluations using VAS correlated strongly with the ATA total scores (Spearman correlation coefficient (r) values: 0.776, 0.783, and 0.909, respectively; p-values: p<0.001, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively). According to Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis, the cut-off value of ATA was 50 (sensitivity=84.4%, specificity=82.40%).en_US
dc.identifier.citationTurkısh Thoracıc Journal, 21,(2), 2020en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2019.180186
dc.identifier.issn2149-2530
dc.identifier.pmid32202998en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087032857en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid360656en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/360656
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2019.180186
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000521158300004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAVESen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.subjectAllergyen_US
dc.subjectAsthmaen_US
dc.subjectAsthma controlen_US
dc.subjectQuestionnaireen_US
dc.titleValidity and Reliability of the Assessment Tool for Asthma (ATA) Questionnaire: the ATA Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
66 Validity and Reliability of the Assessment Tool for Asthma.pdf
Boyut:
168.46 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: