Validity and Reliability of the Assessment Tool for Asthma (ATA) Questionnaire: the ATA Study
dc.authorid | 272290 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Baygül, Arzu | |
dc.contributor.author | Gemicioğlu, Bilun | |
dc.contributor.author | Mungan, Dilşad | |
dc.contributor.author | ;, ve diğerleri | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-27T10:20:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-27T10:20:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.department | İstanbul Beykent Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: A multicenter trial was designed to validate the “Assessment Tools for Asthma” (ATA) questionnaire, a newly developed questionnaire, which evaluates both asthma control and risk factors associated with control in the one instrument. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 810 cases from 14 clinics in 9 Turkish cities. The ATA questionnaire and Asthma Control Test (ACT) were administered. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the control status of 100 randomized cases. ATA is a physician-administered questionnaire including eight items. The ATA comprises two sections: the ATA1 querying symptomatic control criteria and the remaining section querying flare-up of asthma, control of comorbidities, treatment adherence, and inhaler technique. Results: The mean scores for ATA1, ATA total, VAS, and ACT were 24.7±14.8, 53.8±19, 7.1±3, and 18.8±5.5, respectively. According to the ATA questionnaire, among all patients, 34.3% had controlled, 18.8% had partly controlled, and 46.9% had uncontrolled asthma. Further, 16.6% patients had flareups between visits, 96.4% patients had uncontrolled comorbidity, 17% patients had irregular asthma treatment, and only 8.4% patients used the incorrect inhaler technique. The ATA questionnaire showed internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient = 0.683). ACT, ATA1, and two specialists’ evaluations using VAS were highly correlated to ATA total scores; the Spearman correlation coefficient (r) values were 0.776, 0.783, and 0.909, and p values were p<.001, p<.001, and p<.001, respectively. According to ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis, the cut-off value of ATA was 50 (sensitivity=84.4%, specificity=82.40%). Conclusions: The validated ATA questionnaire may be a practical tool for physicians in asthma management. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Turk Thorac J 2019 C5 S1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2019.180186 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0370-2693 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 32202998 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85087032857 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.trdizinid | 360656 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/360656 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2019.180186 | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000521158300004 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | TR-Dizin | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.subject | Asthma | en_US |
dc.subject | Allergy | en_US |
dc.title | Validity and Reliability of the Assessment Tool for Asthma (ATA) Questionnaire: the ATA Study | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Dosyalar
Orijinal paket
1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
- İsim:
- 08 Validity and Reliability of the Assessment Tool for Asthma (ATA) Questionnaire.pdf
- Boyut:
- 1019.33 KB
- Biçim:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Açıklama:
Lisans paketi
1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
- İsim:
- license.txt
- Boyut:
- 1.44 KB
- Biçim:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Açıklama: