Assessment of the content and quality of YouTube videos related zygomatic implants: A content-quality analysis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Gulhan
dc.contributor.authorKocaelli, Humeyra Arikan
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T10:32:54Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T10:32:54Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Beykent Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroductionThis study aimed to evaluate the content and quality of YouTube videos of zygomatic implants. MethodsAccording to Google Trends (2021), zygomatic implant was the most preferred keyword related to the topic. Therefore, in this study zygomatic implant was used as a keyword for the video search. Demographic characteristics such as the number of views, likes/dislikes, comments, video duration, number of days after upload, uploaders, and target audiences of the videos were evaluated. To evaluate the accuracy and content quality of videos (available from YouTube), the video information and quality index (VIQI) and global quality scale (GQS) were used. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, Fisher's exact chi-square test, Yates continuity correction, and Spearman correlation analysis (p < 0.05). ResultsA total of 151 videos were searched; 90 met all inclusion criteria. According to the video content score, 78.9% of the videos were identified as low content, 20% as moderate, and 1.1% as high content. There was no statistical difference between the groups in video demographic characteristics (p > 0.001). Conversely, information flow, accuracy of information, video quality and precision, and total VIQI scores were statistically different between the groups. The moderate-content group had a higher GQS score than the low-content group (p < 0.001). The videos were mainly uploaded (40%) from hospitals and universities. Most videos were targeted toward professionals (46.75%). Low-content videos had higher ratings than the moderate- and high-content videos. ConclusionsMost YouTube videos on zygomatic implants showed low-content quality. This implies that YouTube is not a reliable source of information on zygomatic implants. Dentists, prosthodontists, and oral and maxillofacial surgeons should be aware of the content of video-sharing platforms and take responsibility for enriching video content.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cid.13194
dc.identifier.endpage612en_US
dc.identifier.issn1523-0899
dc.identifier.issn1708-8208
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36808698en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85148580735en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage605en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13194
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12662/3657
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000937801500001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Implant Dentistry And Related Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectGQSen_US
dc.subjectvideo contenten_US
dc.subjectVIQIen_US
dc.subjectYouTubeen_US
dc.subjectzygomatic implanten_US
dc.titleAssessment of the content and quality of YouTube videos related zygomatic implants: A content-quality analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu