The effect of finite element modeling assumptions on collapse capacity of an RC frame building

dc.contributor.authorGhaemian, Saeed
dc.contributor.authorMuderrisoglu, Ziya
dc.contributor.authorYazgan, Ufuk
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T10:33:02Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T10:33:02Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİstanbul Beykent Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe main objective of seismic codes is to prevent structural collapse and ensure life safety. Collapse probability of a structure is usually assessed by making a series of analytical model assumptions. This paper investigates the effect of finite element modeling (FEM) assumptions on the estimated collapse capacity of a reinforced concrete (RC) frame building and points out the modeling limitations. Widely used element formulations and hysteresis models are considered in the analysis. A full-scale, three-story RC frame building was utilized as the experimental model. Alternative finite element models are established by adopting a range of different modeling strategies. Using each model, the collapse capacity of the structure is evaluated via Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA). Results indicate that the analytically estimated collapse capacities are significantly sensitive to the utilized modeling approaches. Furthermore, results also show that models that represent stiffness degradation lead to a better correlation between the actual and analytical responses. Results of this study are expected to be useful for in developing proper models for assessing the collapse probability of RC frame structuresen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [213M454]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research is supported and funded by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) for the project Risk of Collapse Based Rating of Damaged Low Rise Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings Subjected to Aftershock Hazard with project number 213M454. This support is greatly acknowledged.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12989/eas.2020.18.5.555
dc.identifier.endpage565en_US
dc.identifier.issn2092-7614
dc.identifier.issn2092-7622
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087898994en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage555en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.5.555
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12662/3740
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000536817400003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTechno-Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEarthquakes And Structuresen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjecttime history analysesen_US
dc.subjectcollapse capacityen_US
dc.subjectincremental dynamic analysis (IDA)en_US
dc.subjectRC buildingsen_US
dc.titleThe effect of finite element modeling assumptions on collapse capacity of an RC frame buildingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar