What do we need for the lithium-air batteries: A promoter or a catalyst?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorFrancia, Carlotta
dc.contributor.authorAmici, Julia
dc.contributor.authorTasarkuyu, Ergun
dc.contributor.authorCoskun, Atila
dc.contributor.authorGul, Omer Faruk
dc.contributor.authorSener, Tansel
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T10:34:57Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T10:34:57Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentİstanbul Beykent Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractLaSr-based perovskite materials are frequently studied as catalyst at the cathode of the lithium-air batteries (LAB). In this study, we compared Pb, Ba and Sr in the form of La0.65X0.35MnO3 (X = Pb, Ba, Sr) at the cathode of LAB in terms of total discharge capacity, cell cycling and discharge reaction products. The electrochemical characterization was carried out at the discharge current density of 200 mA g(-1) under dry oxygen atmosphere. The cell with La0.65Pb0.35MnO3, La0.65Ba0.35MnO3, La0.65Sr0.35MnO3 and Acetylene black carbon (alone) displayed capacity values of 7211 mAh g(-1), 6205 mAh g(-1), 6760 mAh g(-1) and 5925 mAh g(-1), respectively. The number of cycle and the operation time with the cells using La0.65Pb0.35MnO3, La0.65Ba0.35MnO3, La0.65Sr0.35MnO3 and Acetylene black carbon (alone) at 0.1 mA cm(-2) were 35 (650 h), 18 (300 h), 20 (76 h) and 11 (64 h), respectively. The cells with La0.65Pb0.35MnO3 showed columbic efficiencies ranging from 95 to 97% with superior performance compared to La0.65Ba0.35MnO3 and La0.65Sr0.35MnO3 with columbic efficiency of about 87%. The overpotential value was decreased approximately 300 mV by the use of La0.65Sr0.35MnO3 as a catalyst, whereas no change in the overpotential value was observed by the use of La0.65Ba0.35MnO3 and La(0.65)Fb(0.35)MnO(3) as a promoter. (C) 2016 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.042
dc.identifier.endpage20591en_US
dc.identifier.issn0360-3199
dc.identifier.issn1879-3487
dc.identifier.issue45en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84994139874
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage20583en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.042
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12662/4170
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000387522900017
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal Of Hydrogen Energyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectLithium-air batteryen_US
dc.subjectPerovskiteen_US
dc.subjectCatalysten_US
dc.subjectPromoteren_US
dc.titleWhat do we need for the lithium-air batteries: A promoter or a catalyst?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu