Is there any predictive bone parameter for implant stability in 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional radiologic images?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorArsan, Belde
dc.contributor.authorYalcin-Ulker, Gul Merve
dc.contributor.authorMeral, Deniz Gokce
dc.contributor.authorErdem, Tamer Lutfi
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T10:35:08Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T10:35:08Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİstanbul Beykent Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives. This ex vivo study aimed to compare radiomorphometric parameters between 2-dimensional (2-D) and 3-dimensional (3-D) radiographs and evaluate the influence of preoperative radiologic bone parameters on the clinical outcomes of implant stability. Study Design. Implant recipient sites in fresh bovine blocks were evaluated on panoramic radiographs for gray value (GV), fractal dimension (FD), number of connected trabeculae (Co), and density of connected trabeculae (CoD). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were evaluated for trabecular thickness (TbTh), cortical thickness (CTh), degree of anisotropy (DA), FD, and Co. Insertion torque (IT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were measured. Results. GV was significantly correlated with all parameters in 2-D and 3-D images except FD in 2-D and Co in 3-D, and with all surgical parameters (P <= .029). Co and CoD values on panoramic radiographs had significant correlation with TbTh, CTh, and DA values on CBCT images (P < .001). All 2-D parameters and TbTh and CTh in the CBCT data were significantly correlated with IT only (P <= .047). Only GV was correlated with ISQ measurements (P <= .029). Conclusion. GV, Co, and CoD values on panoramic radiographs reflect the architecture of trabecular bone and the thickness of cortical bone, and might help predict implant stability in clinical situations.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.oooo.2020.08.009
dc.identifier.endpage379en_US
dc.identifier.issn2212-4403
dc.identifier.issn2212-4411
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32891573en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85090147856en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage371en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2020.08.009
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12662/4251
dc.identifier.volume131en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000618789000017en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleIs there any predictive bone parameter for implant stability in 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional radiologic images?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu