Evaluation of Bacterial Colonization and Clinical Properties of Different Suture Materials in Dentoalveoler Surgery

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYaman, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorPaksoy, Tugce
dc.contributor.authorUstaoglu, Gulbahar
dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T10:35:00Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T10:35:00Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİstanbul Beykent Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study aimed to compare the effects of 10 different suture materials commonly used in dentoalveolar surgery on wound healing, their postoperative microbial colonization, and related clinical parameters. Methods: A total of 172 suture samples from patients who had undergone extraction of impacted third molars were included in the study. The suture materials studied were poly-glycolide-colactide, fast absorbable poly-glycolide-colactide, poly-glycolic acid-cocaprolactone, polydioxanone, silk, polypropylene, polyvinylidene difluoride, polyamide, polyester, and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). The microbial colonization in all sutures and clinical parameters were evaluated after 1 week. Results: Multifilament sutures had higher bacterial colonization compared with monofilament sutures (P < .001). No dental plaque accumulation was observed in any samples of polypropylene sutures. Polydioxanone, PTFE, and poly-glycolic acid-cocaprolactone sutures exhibited less postoperative slack compared with all other sutures after 1 week. Patients with silk, polyvinylidene difluoride, and PTFE sutures had less suture-related discomfort. According to the Landry index score, monofilament sutures demonstrated superior wound healing to multifilament sutures (P = .019). In addition, nonabsorbable sutures showed significantly better wound epithelization than absorbable sutures (P < .001). Conclusions: Bacterial colonization and tissue reactions due to the surface properties of the suture affected the wound healing after dentoalveolar surgery. Multifilament sutures should not be applied for prolonged periods because of their tendency for microbial colonization. The tissue reaction to the absorbable suture materials may adversely affect wound healing. (C) 2021 The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipBoz Tibbi A. S, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe sutures used in this study were supported by Boz Tibbi A. S, Ankara, Turkey.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joms.2021.09.014
dc.identifier.endpage326en_US
dc.identifier.issn0278-2391
dc.identifier.issn1531-5053
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34673005en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85118352773en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage313en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2021.09.014
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12662/4205
dc.identifier.volume80en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000749307300020en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co-Elsevier Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Bacterial Colonization and Clinical Properties of Different Suture Materials in Dentoalveoler Surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu