Comparison of microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on orthodontic wax materials; an in vitro study

dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Aylin Pasaoglu
dc.contributor.authorUnlu, Ozge
dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T10:34:58Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T10:34:58Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİstanbul Beykent Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/purpose: Orthodontic wax materials are available on the dental market and are given by orthodontists due to pain, sores and irritation caused by treatment. The aim of the study was to compare biofilm formation and microbial adhesion at different time points on different protective materials used against orthodontic wounds in vitro. Materials and methods: Microbial adhesion and biofilm formation were evaluated against Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175 and Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 standard strains on orthodontic wax materials at the 0, 24th, 48th, 72nd, 96th and 120th hour. The Kruskal Wallis test and Bonferroni test were used for statistical evaluations. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: It was observed that S. mutans formed statistically significantly more biofilm on OrthoDots (R) CLEAR (OrVance) than Ora-Aid (TBM Corporation) at the 48th hour (p < 0.05). Furthermore, L. acidophilus formed statistically significantly more biofilm on OrthoDots (R) CLEAR (OrVance) than Brace Gard (R)(Infa-Lab Inc.) at the 72nd, 96th and 120th hours (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Significant differences were noted among the different orthodontic wax materials and both S. mutans and L. acidophilus created biofilm on all waxes at different time points in vitro. To prevent biofilm formation, these waxes need to be refreshed and should not be used for more than 24 h. According to our study, biofilm production performances of pathogens on Brace Gard (R)(Infa-Lab Inc.) are minimal and therefore it may be a better option to use in clinics. However, to our knowledge, this is the first study investigating biofilm formation on waxes and more studies are needed in this field. (c) 2020 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jds.2020.04.011
dc.identifier.endpage499en_US
dc.identifier.issn1991-7902
dc.identifier.issn2213-8862
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33505622en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85084701383en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage493en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.04.011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12662/4186
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000612608300015en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Taiwanen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Dental Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectOrthodonticsen_US
dc.subjectMicrobial adhesionen_US
dc.subjectBiofilm formationen_US
dc.subjectOrthodontic waxen_US
dc.subjectStreptococcus mutansen_US
dc.subjectLactobacillus acidophilusen_US
dc.titleComparison of microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on orthodontic wax materials; an in vitro studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar