Risk of Relapse Assessment Scale for Metamphetamine Abusers: Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish Version

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTuran, Cetin
dc.contributor.authorBudak, Ersin
dc.contributor.authorSenormanci, Guliz
dc.contributor.authorEvren, Cuneyt
dc.contributor.authorUnal, Suheyla
dc.contributor.authorYalcinkaya, Elvan Acikgoz
dc.contributor.authorSenormanci, Omer
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T10:33:23Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T10:33:23Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Beykent Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study aims to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish adaptation of the 16-item Risk of Relapse Assessment Scale (RRAS) for methamphetamine abusers. Methods: A total of 160 patients diagnosed with methamphetamine use disorder were included in this study to evaluate the validity and reliability of the scale. The comparison of the relationship between the Risk of Relapse Assessment Scale, the Substance Craving Scale, and the Relapse Prediction Scale was also carried out. The validity of the Risk of Relapse Assessment Scale was examined in the first step by exploratory factor analysis. The suitability of the data for exploratory factor analysis was evaluated by Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test and Barlett's test. Cronbach's a coefficient and corrected itemtotal correlation value were used to test the reliability of the scale. The validity results of Risk of Relapse Assessment Scale were tested by confirmatory factor analysis. The significance level was set at P < .05 for all analyses. Results: Considering the examination of the internal consistency values of the Risk of Relapse Assessment Scale, Cronbach's a value was detected to be 0.90, and Cronbach's a value of the subscales ranged from 0.72 to 0.90. The study determined that the goodness of fit values for RRAS were x(2)/df = 2.13, P <.001, goodness of fit index = 0.88, comparative fit index = 0.92, normed fit index = 0.86, Trucker-Lewis index = 0.90, root mean square error of approximation = 0.08, and standardized root mean squared residual = 0.06. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that Risk of Relapse Assessment Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool for assessing the risk of methamphetamine relapse in Turkish.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/pcp.2023.23671
dc.identifier.endpage162en_US
dc.identifier.issn2475-0573
dc.identifier.issn2475-0581
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85169816486en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage156en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/pcp.2023.23671
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12662/3933
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001104857000001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAvesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPsychiatry And Clinical Psychopharmacologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleRisk of Relapse Assessment Scale for Metamphetamine Abusers: Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish Versionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu