Are YouTube videos useful as a source of information for oral care of leukemia patients?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSalli, Gulay Altan
dc.contributor.authorEgil, Edibe
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T10:33:13Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T10:33:13Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİstanbul Beykent Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Video sharing sites are a popular and useful way to spread information.The aim of this study was to evaluate information about oral care for leukemia patients and quality of information related to videos available on YouTube. Method and materials: In this cross-sectional study, YouTube videos were analyzed according to the information content. The search was performed in English and using the search term: leukemia/oral care. The following information was registered: date of upload, source of upload, duration, total views, number of likes, number of dislikes, number of comments, overall quality. The overall quality of videos was assessed using the following quality criteria presented in the Global Quality Scale (GQS): poor, generally poor, moderate, good, and excellent. In addition, videos were classified as useful, misleading, and patient personal experience. Videos were assessed in terms of definition, etiology, pathogenesis, symptoms, treatment, and oral care for leukemia. Results: Sixty-three videos (78.8%) were classified as useful, 6 (7.5%) as misleading and 11 (13.8%) as a patient's personal experience. Thirteen videos (16.3%) discussed the definition of leukemia, 8 (10.0%) discussed etiology, 6 (7.5%) discussed pathogenesis, 7 (8.8%) discussed symptoms of leukemia, 50 (62.5%) discussed treatment choices, and 15 videos (18.8%) discussed oral care of leukemia. Thirteen videos (16.3%) were assessed as poor, 17 (21.3%) as generally poor, 39 (48.8%) as moderate, 10 (12.5%) as good quality, and 1 (1.3%) as excellent. There was a significant difference between the content of videos and the number of views, number of likes, number of dislikes, and number of comments (P < .05). There was a significant difference between the content of videos and number of views, number of likes, number of dislikes, and number of comments (P = .007, P = .006, P = .049, and P = .011 respectively). There was no significant difference between demographic parameters and quality of video. There was no significant difference between demographic parameters (except duration, P = .025) and source of information. Conclusions: YouTube is a useful source of information on leukemia. Health care professionals should take into consideration that YouTube is an effective information tool for the patient.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.qi.a43665
dc.identifier.endpage85en_US
dc.identifier.issn0033-6572
dc.identifier.issn1936-7163
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31781693en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85076329872en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage78en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a43665
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12662/3837
dc.identifier.volume51en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000503836600010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofQuintessence Internationalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjecthealthen_US
dc.subjectleukemiaen_US
dc.subjectoral careen_US
dc.subjectvideoen_US
dc.subjectYouTubeen_US
dc.titleAre YouTube videos useful as a source of information for oral care of leukemia patients?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu