Are YouTube videos about skull bone anatomy useful for students?

dc.contributor.authorCuglan, Songul
dc.contributor.authorGas, Selin
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T10:30:35Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T10:30:35Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİstanbul Beykent Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the content, quality, and functionality of YouTube videos on the anatomy of skull bones and to measure their educational usefulness. In this cross-sectional study, the keywords skull bones and skull anatomy were searched in the YouTube search tab. Demographic data such as type, source, duration, upload date, and view rates of the videos were recorded. The quality and content of the videos were measured using the total content score (TCS), modified DISCERN scale, JAMA score, and Global Quality Scale (GQS). SPSS 26.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Twenty-five (34.7%) of the first 72 videos found by keyword searches were included in the study. According to the GQS criteria, six of them (24%) were considered useful and 19 (76%) not useful. There was a strong statistically significant correlation between the GQS and DISCERN scores (r = 0.813, p < 0.001). There were strong statistically significant positive correlations between TCS and GQS scores (r = 0.887, p < 0.001) and between TCS and modified DISCERN scores (r = 0.691, p < 0.001). Additionally, there was a moderately strong statistically significant positive correlation between GQS and JAMA scores (r = 0.507, p < 0.05). There were also moderately strong statistically significant correlations between JAMA score and DISCERN score (r = 0.521, p < 0.001), video length (r = 0.416, p < 0.05), number of comments (r = 0.457, p < 0.05), and number of likes (r = 0.608, p < 0.001). There was a moderately strong statistically significant positive correlation between TCS and JAMA scores (r = 0.431, p < 0.05). Most YouTube videos have insufficient information about skull bones to meet the expectations of medical and dental school curricula. Anatomists and institutions should be encouraged to prepare and present YouTube videos using assessment systems such as DISCERN, JAMA, GQS, and TCS, in line with current anatomy curricula.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ca.24138
dc.identifier.issn0897-3806
dc.identifier.issn1098-2353
dc.identifier.pmid38308488en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85184233169en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ca.24138
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12662/3438
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001156539200001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Anatomyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectanatomyen_US
dc.subjectcurriculumen_US
dc.subjectevaluationen_US
dc.subjectinterneten_US
dc.subjectmedical educationen_US
dc.subjectself-directed learningen_US
dc.subjectsocial mediaen_US
dc.subjectYouTubeen_US
dc.titleAre YouTube videos about skull bone anatomy useful for students?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar