Comparison of the Antimony Cementation from Chloride Media Using Various Cementators
dc.contributor.author | Kucukoglu, Ozgun | |
dc.contributor.author | Cetiner, Burcu Nilgun | |
dc.contributor.author | Morcali, Mehmet Hakan | |
dc.contributor.author | Aktas, Serdar | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-13T10:30:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-13T10:30:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.department | İstanbul Beykent Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This study compares the cementation performance of metallic iron, metallic aluminum, and metallic tin in terms of the reaction conditions and parameters in synthetic antimony chloride solutions. The effects on the antimony recovery (%) caused by the cementators' types, stirring speed, reaction time, and temperatures were explored thoroughly. The cementation kinetics of antimony were also explored for each cementator. The activation energies were determined to be 10.99, 9.09, and 13.58 kJ mol(-1) for Al, Fe, and Sn, respectively. The results reveal that the reaction is diffusion controlled, and comparable results were obtained for each cementator. At 25 degrees C, 40 mg of iron powder was found to reduce all antimony ions (i.e., approx. 99% recovery), but even when 100 mg of Al and Sn cementators were used, the antimony recovery did not reach 100%. This result shows that iron is the best candidate to cement antimony out of the solution. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Marmara University Scientific Research Unit [FEN-C-DRP-090517-0283] | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This study is a part of the doctorate thesis of Mr. ozgun Kucukolu and was financially supported by the Marmara University Scientific Research Unit under the project FEN-C-DRP-090517-0283. The authors would like to thank American Manuscript Editors for editing the manuscript. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s42461-021-00489-6 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 804 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2524-3462 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2524-3470 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85123849709 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 793 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00489-6 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12662/3599 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 39 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000749009200001 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer Heidelberg | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Mining Metallurgy & Exploration | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Cementation | en_US |
dc.subject | Reduction | en_US |
dc.subject | Replacement | en_US |
dc.subject | Antimony | en_US |
dc.subject | Chloride media | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of the Antimony Cementation from Chloride Media Using Various Cementators | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |