The comparison of edema and ecchymosis after piezoelectric and conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty

dc.contributor.authorTaskin, Umit
dc.contributor.authorBatmaz, Timur
dc.contributor.authorErdil, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Salih
dc.contributor.authorYucebas, Kadir
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T10:30:42Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T10:30:42Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentİstanbul Beykent Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe basic aim of our study is to compare the results of the conventional and piezoelectric osteotomy in rhinoplasty by complete subperiosteal degloving of nasal bone to minimize soft-tissue injury. The study was designed as a prospective, double-blind, randomized, and controlled study. Setting is a tertiary referral hospital in Turkey. Ninety patients who underwent primary open rhinoplasty with osteotomy, performed by either the conventional instruments or the piezoelectric device. The complete subperiosteal degloving of the entire nasal bone was done up to the nasal maxillary sulcus, medial canthus, and nasion in all patients, independent of the type of osteotomy device used. Patients subsequently underwent median-oblique and lateral osteotomy, either with an ultrasonic device or a conventional 2-mm guarded, straight osteotome. The postoperative edema and ecchymosis were evaluated by another surgeon who was blinded to the osteotomy procedure on postoperative days 2 and 7. The edema scores were significantly increased on the second day compared with the seventh day in both groups 1 and 2. However, there was no significant difference between groups. The ecchymosis scores were slightly higher in postoperative day 2, compared with day 7, in both groups 1 and 2, but statistically not significant. This study showed that the main reason edema and ecchymosis are seen post-rhinoplasty is related to soft-tissue injury during osteotomy.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00405-016-4306-9
dc.identifier.endpage865en_US
dc.identifier.issn0937-4477
dc.identifier.issn1434-4726
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27640142en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84988378393en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage861en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4306-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12662/3504
dc.identifier.volume274en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000394351800035en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Archives Of Oto-Rhino-Laryngologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectRhinoplastyen_US
dc.subjectOsteotomyen_US
dc.subjectEdemaen_US
dc.subjectEcchymosisen_US
dc.titleThe comparison of edema and ecchymosis after piezoelectric and conventional osteotomy in rhinoplastyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar