Comparing the effects of endometrial injury with hysteroscopy or Pipelle cannula on fertility outcome

dc.contributor.authorTurktekin, N.
dc.contributor.authorKarakus, C.
dc.contributor.authorOzyurt, R.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T10:33:38Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T10:33:38Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİstanbul Beykent Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of mechanical endometrial injury performed with hysteroscopy or Pipelle cannula on fertility outcome in patients with implantation failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with a history of two or more failed ICSI despite the transfer of high-quality embryos were equally divided into three groups: Group A - injury with hysteroscopy (n=20), Group B - injury with Pipelle cannula (n=20). Group C - no injury (n=20). Patients in group A underwent endometrial injury with monopolar needle forceps between days 10-12 of the proliferative phase in the preceding cycle before ovarian stimulation. Patients in group B underwent endometrial injury with Pipelle cannula between days 22-24 of the mid-luteal phase in the preceding cycle. Patients in group C had no injuries. Beta-hCG. clinical pregnancy, live birth and miscarriage rates were analyzed among the groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in terms of positive pregnancy test. clinical pregnancy and live birth rates between hysteroscopy and Pipelle groups. Compared to the control group. both clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were found to be significantly higher in patients who underwent endometrial injury with hysteroscopy or Pipelle cannula. Miscarriage rates in the control group were significantly higher than those in the Pipella or hysteroscopic injury. CONCLUSIONS: Endometrial injuries performed in the follicular phase with hysteroscopic monopolar forceps or in the secretory phase with Pipelle cannula increase pregnancy and live birth.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage4697en_US
dc.identifier.issn1128-3602
dc.identifier.issue13en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35856360en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85134238560
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage4693en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12662/4067
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000837256500020
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherVerduci Publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Review For Medical And Pharmacological Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEndometrial injuryen_US
dc.subjectHysteroscopyen_US
dc.subjectPipette cannulaen_US
dc.subjectClinical pregnancyen_US
dc.subjectLive birthen_US
dc.subjectMiscarriageen_US
dc.titleComparing the effects of endometrial injury with hysteroscopy or Pipelle cannula on fertility outcomeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar