The Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome A Randomized Controlled Study

dc.contributor.authorKaraaslan, Yasemin
dc.contributor.authorSahbaz, Yasemin
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Dildade Dilek
dc.contributor.authorZiroglu, Nezih
dc.contributor.authorAltun, Suleyman
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, Ebru Kaya
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T10:35:33Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T10:35:33Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Beykent Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectiveThe aim of the study is to compare the effects of exercise training plus neuromuscular electrical stimulation with exercise training alone on shoulder function, pain, range of motion, and muscle strength in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.DesignPatients were randomly divided into groups of exercise training (n = 24) and exercise training + neuromuscular electrical stimulation (n = 24). Shoulder function was evaluated with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, pain level was assessed with a visual analog scale, range of motion was measured with a goniometer, and muscle strength was assessed with a handheld dynamometer baseline and at the end of treatment (week 8).ResultsIn both groups, shoulder function, range of motion, and muscle strength (except flexion muscle strength in the exercise training group) increased, while pain decreased (P < 0.05). Compared with the exercise training group, visual analog scale-activity and visual analog scale-night decreased more, and external-rotation range of motion and whole muscle strength increased more in the exercise training + neuromuscular electrical stimulation group (P < 0.05). On the other hand, the effect sizes were medium to large for both groups.ConclusionsThe addition of neuromuscular electrical stimulation treatment to exercise training did not improve shoulder function, which is the primary outcome, more than exercise training alone, but increased muscle strength and range of motion (external-rotation only) and decreased pain (activity-night), which are the secondary outcomes.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/PHM.0000000000002103
dc.identifier.endpage403en_US
dc.identifier.issn0894-9115
dc.identifier.issn1537-7385
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36095157en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85153124203en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage396en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002103
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12662/4487
dc.identifier.volume102en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000985327400008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal Of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSubacromial Impingement Syndromeen_US
dc.subjectShoulder Painen_US
dc.subjectRange of Motionen_US
dc.subjectExerciseen_US
dc.subjectElectric Stimulation Therapyen_US
dc.titleThe Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome A Randomized Controlled Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar