A comparison of Kinesio taping and external electrical stimulation in addition to pelvic floor muscle exercise and sole pelvic floor muscle exercise in women with overactive bladder: a randomized controlled study

dc.contributor.authorCelenay, Seyda Toprak
dc.contributor.authorKaraaslan, Yasemin
dc.contributor.authorCoban, Ozge
dc.contributor.authorOskay, Kemal
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T10:35:24Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T10:35:24Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİstanbul Beykent Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose To compare the effects of Kinesio taping (R) (KT) and external electrical stimulation (ES) in addition to pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME) and sole PFME in women with overactive bladder (OAB). Material and methods Patients with OAB were randomly allocated into PFME, PFME + KT, PFME + ES groups. All treatments were carried out for 6 weeks. OAB symptoms with voiding diary and Overactive Bladder-Version8 (OAB-V8), pelvic floor muscle strength (PFMS) with perineometer, quality of life with King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) were assessed before (BT) and after treatment (AT). AT, the perception of improvement was inquired. Results AT, OAB symptoms and KHQ scores decreased and PFMS improved in all groups (p < 0.05). The intergroup comparisons revealed a further decrease in voids/day, voids/night, OAB-V8, and some KHQ scores, and a further increase in the perception of improvement in the PFME + KT and PFME + ES groups compared to the PFME group (p < 0.05). In the PFME + ES group, there was a further decrease in numbers of incontinence compared to the PFME group, and in severity measures scores compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion KT and external ES in addition to PFME were more effective than PFME alone in the treatment of OAB.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAnkara Yildirim Beyazit University Scientific Research Projects Officeen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAnkara Yildirim Beyazit University Scientific Research Projects Office provided treatment device for the present study. The authors did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09638288.2021.1925751
dc.identifier.endpage5132en_US
dc.identifier.issn0963-8288
dc.identifier.issn1464-5165
dc.identifier.issue18en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34098818en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85107466020en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage5124en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1925751
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12662/4409
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000658640600001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofDisability And Rehabilitationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectElectrical stimulationen_US
dc.subjectexerciseen_US
dc.subjectoveractive bladderen_US
dc.subjectpelvic flooren_US
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trialen_US
dc.titleA comparison of Kinesio taping and external electrical stimulation in addition to pelvic floor muscle exercise and sole pelvic floor muscle exercise in women with overactive bladder: a randomized controlled studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar