Evaluating the Effect of Different Laser Types on Dentin Fracture Resistance

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÜrkmez H.F.
dc.contributor.authorGüneç H.G.
dc.contributor.authorHaznedaroğlu F.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T10:00:53Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T10:00:53Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİstanbul Beykent Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to use fracture testing methods to evaluate the impact of the use of different laser types–particularly diode, Nd:YAG and Er:YAG lasers–on dentin fracture resistance. Materials and Methods: Ninety human maxillary incisors were used. The teeth were divided into three experimental groups and three control groups, each containing 15 samples. The laser treatments were a diode laser for experimental group 1, a Nd:YAG laser for experimental group 2, and an Er:YAG laser for experimental group 3. The teeth were then dried and obturated using the AH-Plus sealer and RevoS AS40 gutta percha (GP). Control group 1 was obturated as in the experimental groups but without laser application; control group 2 was instrumented but not obturated; and negative control group 3 had no procedure performed at all. All samples were fixed in acrylic blocks and were subjected to fracture tests using an Autograph Universal Testing Machine. The results were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics 22 software, one-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s HSD test (to identify groups that cause a difference), with p<0.05 indicating statistical significance. Results: The applied force was significantly lower for control group 2 than for the Er:YAG laser or negative control groups (p<0.05). The remaining groups showed no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) Conclusions: The findings presented here support the conclusions that the use of Nd:YAG, Er:YAG and diode lasers in endodontic treatments has no negative impact on dentin fracture resistance and that these lasers can be used safely. © 2021. All Rights Reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7126/cumudj.775234
dc.identifier.endpage152en_US
dc.identifier.issn2146-2852
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85107686165en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage145en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1112379en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.775234
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1112379
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12662/2814
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCumhuriyet Dental Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectdentinen_US
dc.subjectdisinfectionen_US
dc.subjectEndodonticsen_US
dc.subjectfracture resistanceen_US
dc.subjectlaseren_US
dc.titleEvaluating the Effect of Different Laser Types on Dentin Fracture Resistanceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu