Comparative determination of skeletal maturity by hand–wrist radiograph, cephalometric radiograph and cone beam computed tomography

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTekın A.
dc.contributor.authorCesur Aydın K.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T10:01:11Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T10:01:11Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİstanbul Beykent Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The purpose of this study is to assess the stages of skeletal maturity in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), hand–wrist radiography (HWR) and cephalometric radiography (CR) techniques of orthodontic patients, and associate skeletal maturity stages with chronological age, in a Turkish subpopulation. Methods: Hand–wrist radiographs, cephalometric radiographs and CBCT of 105 patients were evaluated. For evaluation of HWR, the “Hand Bone Age A Digital Atlas of Skeletal Maturity” of Vicente Gilsanz and Osman Ratib (2005) was used. Skeletal maturation in the cephalometric radiographs and sagittal sections of cervical vertebrae obtained by CBCT were evaluated with Hassel and Farman’s method (1995). All results were re-evaluated 3 weeks later to assess intra-observer reliability. Results: Intra-observer reliability coefficients of the skeletal maturity stages in HWR, CR, and CBCT were 0.912, 0.595, 0.756 respectively (p < 0.05). Spearman’s correlation coefficient value between skeletal developmental stages in in HWR, CR, and CBCT was found to be 0.785, 0.875, and 0.791, respectively (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Results of this study reveal that the determination of the skeletal development status with analysis of cervical vertebrae using cephalometric radiographs and CBCT is as reliable method as the evaluation of the hand–wrist radiographs and is compatible with chronological age in a subgroup of the Turkish population. When assessing the skeletal development stages of patients, both CBCT and CR can be used validly, so no extra hand–wrist radiography is required. This information is important for the prevention of increased radiation doses in patients. © 2019, Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11282-019-00408-y
dc.identifier.endpage336en_US
dc.identifier.issn0911-6028
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31482463en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85071744965en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage327en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-019-00408-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12662/3014
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofOral Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCephalometric radiographen_US
dc.subjectChronological ageen_US
dc.subjectCone beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectHand–wrist radiographen_US
dc.subjectSkeletal ageen_US
dc.subjectSkeletal maturationen_US
dc.titleComparative determination of skeletal maturity by hand–wrist radiograph, cephalometric radiograph and cone beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu