Which method for the laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia?; TAPP versus TEP

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSerinsöz, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorAktürk, Remzi
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T09:50:07Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T09:50:07Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİstanbul Beykent Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of this study is to prove that the total extraperitoneal patch plasty (TEP) method can be accepted as a standard methodin elective and appropriate cases.Materials and Methods: Six hundred sixty-five (665/678) patients with an uncomplicated primary inguinal hernia who consentedto participate in the study were randomized into two groups: Group I transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) repair andGroup II TEP repair. Perioperative and postoperative complications and recurrence were detected with the help of radiology unit ofour hospital and recorded. The patients were followed up for 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks.Results: The difference between the number of Tackers and return to work was significant (p<0.05). While complications related tobleeding and anaesthesia were more common in TAPP (p<0.05), no difference was found between the two methods in terms of organinjury and conversion (p>0.05). A significant difference was found between the two methods in terms of all complications exceptfor chronic pain, seroma of inguinal area, subcutaneous emphysema and testicular ischemia (p <0.05). No significant differencewas found between obese patients and other groups when BMI groups were evaluated in terms of perioperative and postoperativecomplications (p>0.05).Conclusion: It is indisputable that the TEP method is less invasive than TAPP. TAPP should still remain method used in thelaparoscopic hernia learning curve for the pushing forward of laparoscopic anatomy vision and used for very complicated inguinalhernias such as the undescended testis and giant inguinal hernias.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.358
dc.identifier.endpage3200en_US
dc.identifier.issn2636-7688
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.startpage3193en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid428020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.358
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/428020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12662/2454
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Medical Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleWhich method for the laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia?; TAPP versus TEPen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu