Türksever, ANEAtalik, G2024-03-132024-03-1320010303-8300https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026512732318https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12662/329339th Congress of the European-Regional-Science-Association -- AUG, 1999 -- DUBLIN, IRELANDRecently, quality of life has become a commonly used concept and is showing growing significance in economic and political terms. Additionally, quality of life issues have been recognized within the migration processes. In one view, quality of life relates to the degree to which the necessary conditions for satisfaction exists in a given society or region. It is argued that quality, as a measurable variable would refer to both the subject and the object of inquiry. In this sense, quality of life has two aspects, psychological and environmental ones. Nevertheless, this limitation constitutes a major problem since some researchers have totally neglected the perception of the people who live there, while another limitation is about the components, indices and indicators chosen in a certain analysis. In this paper, the aim is to test some measurement methods of the quality of life and to show the possibilities and limitations of a developing area in comparison to developed ones. In this way, some comparative analysis can be performed on the measurement methods of the quality of life levels with respect to regional variations.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessPossibilities and limitations for the measurement of the quality of life in urban areasConference Object10.1023/A:10265127323182-s2.0-00351119231872Q116353WOS:000165792800003Q2